<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cisco VPN Client: Reason 412 &#8211; The remote peer is no longer responding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/</link>
	<description>Free your mind ... and your ass will follow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamnk</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamnk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>Yes i knew that. After how many years ? I worked as a VPN assistant for 2 years now, since the beginning there were always requests for 64-bit version. All i can said to them was sorry, cisco doesn&#039;t offer 64bit, i can&#039;t help you there.

Oh, and the linux client always has problem whenever a new kernel is released. People always have to patch this or that file in order to compile Cisco client. It&#039;s simply not maintained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i knew that. After how many years ? I worked as a VPN assistant for 2 years now, since the beginning there were always requests for 64-bit version. All i can said to them was sorry, cisco doesn&#8217;t offer 64bit, i can&#8217;t help you there.</p>
<p>Oh, and the linux client always has problem whenever a new kernel is released. People always have to patch this or that file in order to compile Cisco client. It&#8217;s simply not maintained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tac</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Tac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>5.0.07.0290 has been released from beta and is official Cisco support for Windows 7. There is a 32bit and 64bit binary available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.0.07.0290 has been released from beta and is official Cisco support for Windows 7. There is a 32bit and 64bit binary available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbydrake</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbydrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 06:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>thanks! this worked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks! this worked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lamnk</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>Lamnk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 04:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what you mean with &quot;certify&quot;. But at my university we requested 64bit version of the ipsec client for many years already, and only until recently released Cisco one that works for Windows Vista and 7. Considering from say2 years ago a lot of recent laptops/computers were already shipped with 4GB RAM, it&#039;s quite ignorance of Cisco, at least from my perspective. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not a Cisco expert but i do know that Cisco ASA line offers SSL VPN with 64bit capable AnyConnect client. However a lot of universities in Germany use old Concentrator 3000 series due to licensing cost. Switching to newer ASA 5500 line requires budget and affects many users (more than 30000 students and employees in Heidelberg). Maybe that&#039;s the reason Cisco doesn&#039;t want to release a 64bit IPsec client: to force buyers upgrade to SSL VPN so they can sell more devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t know what you mean with &#8220;certify&#8221;. But at my university we requested 64bit version of the ipsec client for many years already, and only until recently released Cisco one that works for Windows Vista and 7. Considering from say2 years ago a lot of recent laptops/computers were already shipped with 4GB RAM, it&#39;s quite ignorance of Cisco, at least from my perspective. </p>
<p>I&#39;m not a Cisco expert but i do know that Cisco ASA line offers SSL VPN with 64bit capable AnyConnect client. However a lot of universities in Germany use old Concentrator 3000 series due to licensing cost. Switching to newer ASA 5500 line requires budget and affects many users (more than 30000 students and employees in Heidelberg). Maybe that&#39;s the reason Cisco doesn&#39;t want to release a 64bit IPsec client: to force buyers upgrade to SSL VPN so they can sell more devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 00:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Not completely correct... Cisco may well have refused to &quot;CERTIFY&quot; a 64-bit version of the ipsec based VPN client with Microsoft. I wouldn&#039;t fault them for that considering the cost and effort involved in doing so. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, if you know anything about Cisco you&#039;ll know that all current versions of PIX / ASA support the AnyVPN client with SSL functionality - which is &quot;Certified for Windows&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not completely correct&#8230; Cisco may well have refused to &#8220;CERTIFY&#8221; a 64-bit version of the ipsec based VPN client with Microsoft. I wouldn&#39;t fault them for that considering the cost and effort involved in doing so. </p>
<p>Also, if you know anything about Cisco you&#39;ll know that all current versions of PIX / ASA support the AnyVPN client with SSL functionality &#8211; which is &#8220;Certified for Windows&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nike air force</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2660</link>
		<dc:creator>Nike air force</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2660</guid>
		<description>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the &lt;br&gt;write&#039;s unique &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.discount-louis-vuitton.com&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;louis vuitton bags&lt;/a&gt;  point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those &lt;br&gt;sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally &lt;br&gt;I feel quite well. &lt;br&gt;sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally &lt;br&gt;I feel quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here elaborates the matter not only extensively but also detailly .I support the <br />write&#39;s unique <a href="http://www.discount-louis-vuitton.com"  rel="nofollow">louis vuitton bags</a>  point.It is useful and benefit to your daily life.You can go those <br />sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally <br />I feel quite well. <br />sits to know more relate things.They are strongly recommended by friends.Personally <br />I feel quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dfullen</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-3/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dfullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>Take a look at this post that offers an easy way to solve the problem of Cisco 412 Error.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://links.maas360.com/cisco412Error&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://links.maas360.com/cisco412Error&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this post that offers an easy way to solve the problem of Cisco 412 Error.</p>
<p><a href="http://links.maas360.com/cisco412Error" rel="nofollow">http://links.maas360.com/cisco412Error</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-2/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 02:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>Try changing the Cisco Client to TCP (under Options, Transport).  Worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try changing the Cisco Client to TCP (under Options, Transport).  Worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-2/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>where do I use the keyword UseLegacyIKEPort=1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where do I use the keyword UseLegacyIKEPort=1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lamers</title>
		<link>http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/comment-page-2/#comment-2641</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lamers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lamnk.com/blog/vpn/cisco-vpn-client-reason-412-the-remote-peer-is-no-longer-responding/#comment-2641</guid>
		<description>Dave, the UseLegacyIKEPort=1 option in the .pcf file is *THE* solution!!! many thanks, you saved the day ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, the UseLegacyIKEPort=1 option in the .pcf file is *THE* solution!!! many thanks, you saved the day <img src='http://www.lamnk.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.058 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-03 16:41:20 -->
